Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area boundaries. Anyone?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning sambale<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fineprint: > Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines > Restriction: No restriction of use > Date: 12/08/00 > Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity > Conservation > Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 > Scale: 1:7,500,000 > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor<mur...@mail2engineer.com> > wrote: >> Maning, >> >> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo >> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that >> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape >> file, it is already merged. >> >> >> murlwe >> <-----Original Message-----> >>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] >>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM >>>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national >>> parksboundaries >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I >>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries. >>> >>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import. >>>Download link: >>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip >>> >>> >>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning >>>sambale<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those >>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for >>>biodiversity conservation. >>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road >>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It >>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able >>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of >>>> adding: >>>> 1. rivers >>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse) >>>> 3. coral reefs >>>> >>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way. >>>> >>>> >>>>> thanks. >>>> > noel >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning >>>> sambale<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Not good enough: >>>>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png >>>>> >>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to >>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map. >>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale >>>>> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar >>><sea...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not? >>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding >>>them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example: >>>>>> >>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park >>>>>> boundary=national_park >>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref: >>>>>> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html >>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta >>>used in its >>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map >>>Maker. For >>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park: >>>>>>> >>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13 >>>>>> >>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato: >>>>>> >>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF >>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale >>><emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial >>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland >>>water priority >>>>>>>> areas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional >>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland >>>water priority >>>>>>>> areas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas >>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial components >>>vis-a-vis >>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated >>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Fineprint: >>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines >>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use >>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00 >>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine >>>Biodiversity >>>>>>>> Conservation >>>>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 >>>>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should we add them? FYI, we have 1 national park boundary >>>added already: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&layers=B000FTF >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> maning >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> talk-ph mailing list >>>>>>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> maning >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> cheers, >>>>> maning >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> cheers, >>>> maning >>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>cheers, >>>maning >>>------------------------------------------------------ >>>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >>>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >>>------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>talk-ph mailing list >>>talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>>t >> >> _______________________________________________________________ >> Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com >> Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More! > > > > -- > cheers, > maning > ------------------------------------------------------ > "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden > wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ > blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------ > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph