I finally updated the barangay boundaries of Markina to cover all the other barangay. To all boundary relation experts, please have a look. I'm not very sure if I properly tagged the relations. The Tanong and De la Pena bnds have some conflicts. I will verify the actual boundaries with the LGU.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:48 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK will do that later. > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> The ones I've checked look good. One suggestion, add an admin_level=* tag to >> the individual ways. The number will correspond to the highest >> administrative boundary. So for the Marikina barangay boundaries, it will be >> either 10 (barangay), 6 (city), or 3 (region [Metro Manila]). >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:28 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Finally re-visited Marikina city and barangay boundaries. Please >>> check if I made the correct relation tags. >>> City boundary: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/146949 >>> Barangay boundary: >>> >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Manila/Boundary_Relations#Marikina >>> >> >> > > > > -- > cheers, > maning > ------------------------------------------------------ > "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden > wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ > blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------ > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
