The best initial unit for the proposed tiers would be provincial or legislative
boundaries for rural areas and city/municipal or even barangay boundaries for
urban areas.
Tony Montana: Me, I want what's coming to me.
Manny Ribera: Oh, well what's coming to you?
Tony Montana: The world, chico, and everything in it.
-----
Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
Facebook: ian.lopez
________________________________
From: maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
To: ianlopez <ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com>
Cc: OSM-PH <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] mega-micro-detail or even coverage?
Eugene also defined level's of detail here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Geodata_detail_levels
I'm interested in visualizing this kind of metric. What would be the
best initial unit? A municipal boundary? a square grid? etc?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:47 PM, ianlopez <ian_lopez_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm also guilty of that.
> Admissions aside, I think that we should have a tier/level for a more even
> coverage
> Tier/Level 1: Major highways, large rivers
> Tier/Level 2: Minor highways, enclosed waterways (lakes, lagoons)
> Tier/Level 3: Buildings, landuse, small rivers and streams
> Tier/Level 4: POI's (amenities and shops)
> Tier/Level 5: Picnic tables, individual trees, wastebaskets, lamp posts
>
> Example: If one mapper in a certain area maps at least 60-70% of elements
> needed in Tier/Level1, he can go on to mapping 60-70% of elements needed in
> Tier/Level 2, and so on. It doesn't mean that everyone has to follow it,
> but at least we have some guide/idea on what to map first.
>
> Tony Montana: Me, I want what's coming to me.
> Manny Ribera: Oh, well what's coming to you?
> Tony Montana: The world, chico, and everything in it.
> -----
> Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
> OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
> Facebook: ian.lopez
>
> ________________________________
> From: maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
> To: osm-ph <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:15 PM
> Subject: [talk-ph] mega-micro-detail or even coverage?
>
> Hi,
>
> A very interesting talk by Harry Wood last SOTM2011 (I was on the
> other room presenting State of the PH during that time). Blog and
> link to videos and slides here:
> http://www.harrywood.co.uk/blog/2011/10/10/sotm-talk/
>
> The main message is that while some areas are getting enormous level
> of detail the coverage seems to be very uneven (slides 43 onwards). I
> think this is happening in some areas in the Philippine map.
> Some mappers are doing micro-detail mapping (I'm guilty myself) while
> in other places, data is barely updated if updated at all.
> Micro-detail mapping is good but it is very difficult for new mapper s
> to contribute to these areas leaving the impression that is is already
> complete.
>
> Should we go for detail or even coverage? Where do we draw the line?
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
--
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
