+1 On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I propose to delete the imagery coverage outlines that are currently > in the OSM database (most are tagged with the special > "outline=imagery" tag). Since we already have an imagery coverage > map[1], I think that there's no longer any need to retain these > outlines in the database, especially since they clutter up editing, > are inadvertently joined to streets and roads by users, and they don't > correspond to anything real on the ground and therefore do not really > belong in the database in the first place.. > > If there's new imagery, we just trace the outlines and then I can take > them and merge them into the coverage map. > > What do you think? > > [1] http://forge.codedgraphic.com/osm/imagery_coverage/ > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
