Hi Lavanya, I personally would tag this the same as the side street and not the link version of the major road.
My reason is: imagine if the side street actually goes through the major road to the other side. To me it makes logical sense that the minor street retains the characteristics such as name and type on its entire length and not be suddenly interrupted just because it crosses a major street. I then use the same logic even if the minor street ends on the major street like in your example. But I know that other people have different opinions on this and you can see both types of tagging worldwide. I say just leave things as they are and only change them if you have compelling reasons to do so such as local road and traffic conditions. For example, if more drivers use this bit of road to transfer between the major and minor road then tag it as minor. But if more drivers use it to make u-turns on the major road then making it a major link road makes sense. ~Eugene On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 11:45 AM grab osm via talk-ph < talk-ph@openstreetmap.org wrote: > Apologize Erwin. > > Here are the further details of our question. > > When a way segment that connects to a Major road, please suggest if the > the connector should have same classification as the way segment or that of > a Major Road with link attribute assigned > > Below is an example: > [image: image] > <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38514914/51738144-70316c00-20b4-11e9-807a-a809f4f1c068.png> > Please suggest, if any further infirnation is needed. > > Thanks > Lavanya >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
