I generally agree except for the cases where the tag value corresponds to an administrative entity that already has a boundary relation. In which case I would then remove the tag.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:16 AM Erwin Olario, <gov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Until we have a complete, and accurate sub-national boundary polygons in > the Philippines, I'd like to suggest that we avoid removing is_in tags, as > these may still contain valuable information that cannot be deduced from > still non-existent boundaries. > > What do you think? > > /erwin > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > » email: erwin@ <er...@ngnuity.net>*n**gnu**it**y**.xyz* > <http://ngnuity.net/> | gov...@gmail.com > » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin > » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 > D56B > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >
_______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
