Just one quick note, please split building tags from other features. For example, in educational institutions, you have both amenity, operator combined with building:levels, floor:material, roof:material. The spreadsheet seems to indicate this should be added for each feature which is not good practice. Also, Im not sure if you did so already, make sure you align with what HOTOSM PH previously did in Pampanga. Just looking at the educ insti tab, it looks like it's not aligned with what they did in Pampanga.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:24 PM Mark Aimon Pangan <markimon.pan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, everyone! > > Action for Economic Reforms (AER) is planning on conducting field mapping as > part of the COLLABDev and PH3D projects where we aim to provide tools for > more data-driven planning and decision making to our partner municipalities. > > In line with this, we have drafted a data model for the features that our > team and partners will be collecting on field. We would like to get your > comments and opinions on the combination of tags we'll be using. > > Document access is limited to Commenter. > Access the document here: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lW5vPI-h6Yc9qAJbrDZuxMUszz5jjpAIN8vlb-IR4BY/edit?usp=sharing > > All the best, > Aimon > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://github.com/maning http://twitter.com/maningsambale ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
