I have not seen anything on the wiki or elsewhere that data will be _removed_ from OSM for non-relicensed data. Are you sure this is even considered? References?
/Simon bengt bäverman <be...@baverman.se> writes: > What are we doing? > > Is it *really* worth changing the license if we risk loosing so very > large parts of what we in the end want to create and preserve, even > protect? > > When will the information in red be deleted unless the contributing > user accepts the new licence agreement? > > cheers > BengtB > > 2010/11/10 Hanno Hecker <vetinari+...@ankh-morp.org>: >> Hej, >> >> now there's (finally) a map which shows which areas are affected by the >> licence change to ODBL: http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/ >> All roads in red will disappear from OSM if the users do not accept the >> new licence, which means, that cities like Göteborg [0] or Kalmar [1] >> will (mostly) disappear from the OSM maps. Yellow are uncertain, >> because a mix of users have edited them, green will stay. >> >> Hanno >> >> P.S.: please be kind to the server, this seems to be someone's >> workstation ;-) >> >> [0]: >> http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13&lat=57.70163&lon=11.97987&layers=B0 >> [1]: >> http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13&lat=56.68592&lon=16.31432&layers=B0 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-se mailing list >> Talk-se@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-se mailing list > Talk-se@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se _______________________________________________ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se