Dammit. Once again I replied to the original author only, this morning. :( here is what I wrote...
----------------------- Hi Brian. Brian Prangle wrote: > We discussed at our West Mids meeting last night the best way forward. Here > is what we would like to see happen: These are some good ideas, I believe. > 2. If it's easy to code, generate ways between related nodes for things > like plusbus zones, stopareas etc. We didn't discuss however how to tag > these, so I guess just leave them untagged. If it's going to be difficult > and slow down the implementation, then ignore it and just import the nodes > and we'll have to generate ways manually. Can you please clarify this? >From your words I assume that NAPtaN groups stop elements by drawing a perimeter around them? Or connect them all with ways? If that is the case I oppose the physical marking you seem to suggest and would rather group them logical by means of a relation. OSM does have the necessary data models for that, which NAPtaN seems lacking. The conversion would be something like: If element is withing boundaries in NAPTaN, they will become members of the stop_area-relation. If I misunderstood, please ignore :) Gerrit _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit