I agree that this makes sense - the only change I would want is for the green (i.e completed) status to also require the presence of shelter=yes/no i.e presence of shelter key regardless of value
2009/4/3 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) <ajrli...@googlemail.com> > Christoph, > > http://www.mappa-mercia.org/cgi-bin/naptanmerger.wsgi/ Looking good :-) > > A few comments on how this might work. Suggestions only for you to think > about and to elicit comments from others. > > Green would show a stop that's got merged data, i.e. it's a done deal and > no > further work is required. To flag this as green you would check for: > > highway=bus_stop > The presence of the naptan:atcoCode key > naptan:unverified=yes tag is no longer present > route_ref tag is present > > Orange would be one step down where one or more of the above are false > except for the following specific cases: > > Yellow (or some other colour) would be a NaPTAN imported node which > contains: > no highway=bus_stop tag > The presence of the naptan:atcoCode key > naptan:unverified=yes tag is still present > > Blue (or some other colour) would be a node which has highway=bus_stop but > no naptan tags indicating that its OSM suryeyed data alone. > > Red, to denote a naptan node that has no physical presence on the ground > and > no known use as a bus stop. This would be a node containing: > > no highway=bus_stop tag > naptan tags present > physically_present=no tag present > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list > talk-gb-westmidla...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
