On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Shaun McDonald <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk>wrote:
It's not until later this year until the route will come under the > government arm. > Yeah, I was joking. It's a little premature. Still, I wonder what the operator name should be? uk_government? Or operator=nationalised? > What about the trains on the East Coast Route that go to Glasgow (via > Motherwell), Aberdeen, and Inverness (i.e. North/West of Edinburgh). Should > those tails be added to the route too, or a separate relation? > This is where the relation type=route gets a little fuzzy. Are we representing a service pattern, or a franchise, or a named rail corridor? This has confused me recently when tagging heritage railways ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_Independent_and_minor_railways). For instance on the Mid Norfolk railway ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165383), should "name=Mid Norfolk Railway" be present on the relation, the ways, or both? Frankie > Shaun > > On 1 Jul 2009, at 18:09, Frankie Roberto wrote: > > Is it too soon to add operator=uk_government to > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4330149? :-) > > Frankie > > (P.S there doesn't seem to be a relation that covers the route yet). > > -- > Frankie Roberto > Experience Designer, Rattle > 0114 2706977 > http://www.rattlecentral.com > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > > > -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
