I'd agree with Brian; the infrastructure relations don't help. At last count the services using the line were:
VT: Euston-Birmingham & Wolverhampton (aka EBW) (InterCity) XC: Manchester-Bournemouth (InterCity) LM: Northampton/Coventry-Birmingham (Regional locals; there's quite a bit of skip-stopping, but not a distinctive express service) ATW: Aberystwyth/Chester-Birmingham International (Regional Express) (and some WSMR too; InterCity) Getting those on a map (at least the hourly ones) will be complicated enough. I'd suggest using the TOC abbreviations as the ref for the moment. Calling it the WCML isn't really correct (the WCML proper goes Rugby-Nuneaton-Tamworth etc) Richard On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brian Prangle <bpran...@googlemail.com>wrote: > I've experimented with the section of the West Coast Mainline between B'ham > New St and B'ham International: I've added a train (i.e service) relation > with ref=WCML and also a railway (i.e physical) relation with ref =17.01 ( > the SRS dor the section of track) to see how it rendered in opnvkarte. I'd > appreciate people's opinions now the render engine has caught up. Personally > I don't like it and I think the physical stuff is better tagged on the ways; > opnvkarte is a public transport map and should show services > > Regards > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
