UK bus stops all have codes (taken from the NaPTAN import), for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/533877725
If it's not displayed on the stop, any reference should be prefixed with the source. That stop also has a publicly-displayed code which is tagged as ref=69345648. This is actually the numeric equivalent of the NaPTAN code (oxfgjmgt). Both these codes can be used to look information up on the internet. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Uller <a.ul...@gmx.at> wrote: > Dear list, > > First I'd like to say hello, my name is Andreas, and I consider it one of > my main priorities in OSM to map things related to public transport > (routes, stops) in my home city of Graz, Austria and beyond. > > The bus and tram lines in Graz are complete for quite some time now, so I > started entering all the regional bus lines in Styria (a list of the > current progress is here: [1]). Of course, I use the current tagging > scheme, which can be quite tideous for regional buslines, because often > there are many variants which each should get their own relation. My > "masterpiece" so far are the bus routes 200/201 with a total of 62 variants > (the timetable is so long, it's split into two files: [2],[3], > route_masters in OSM: [4],[5]). > So far the biggest problem was finding the correct position of bus stops > in rural areas, where they often can't be seen on aerial images (no > road-markings, no bays, no shelters...). Therefore, I'm very happy that we > got the position of all public transport stops in Styria for use in OSM. > The planned import is outlined here: [6] and a discussion has been started > on the imports-Mailinglist: [7]. > > The reason for my mail to you is: > We also received a lot of attributes for each platform, including a unique > ID per platform, which has been identified as the IFOPT-number, an > internationally unique number. It appears unclear, if this number should be > added to all the platforms in OSM, or if this is unnecessary/unwanted. Has > there already been a discussion on how (if at all) to use this number? The > most straigh-forward method that comes to my mind would be to include it as > ref:IFOPT, but what is the opinion on this list? > I think it could become important when timetable- or real-time-data > becomes available, but I don't know if this is true. > > I'm looking forward to you answers, > Andreas > > [1] > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Austria/Regionalbusse_Steiermark > [2] http://verbundlinie.at/busbahnbim-auskunft/pdf/j13/stv_40200m_j13.pdf > [3] http://verbundlinie.at/busbahnbim-auskunft/pdf/j13/stv_40200n_j13.pdf > [4] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/955209 > [5] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2165551 > [6] > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Austria/Import_Haltestellen_Steiermark > [7] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-November/002428.html > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
