Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I would ask you what was the problem? I could swear there was no segment missing.
Gracias, David El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió: > Hola David, > > Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin? > > Jo > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez <serp...@apuntia.com > <mailto:serp...@apuntia.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the > PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the > existence > of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue, > except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong > direction when > using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are > ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths. > Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route > being a round trip or what I am missing. > > This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and > the problematic segments seem to be: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480 > > > Thank you for your help, > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
