On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 14:30, Snusmumriken <snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com> wrote: > > Somehow I think that it is too late to define one schema that would > rule the world. Too much has already been mapped for it to be redone. > But I might be wrong. I also share your observation that PTv2 is way > too complex.
In my opinion, it's never too late for improvements. :) And if we go for the first solution ("improved PTv1"), not much retagging were required as nearly all stops, stations and platforms use the PTv1 tags for rendering anyway. > For what it is worth I might point you to have a look at how things are > mapped in Stockholm metropolitan region. It is our version of a > simplified PTv2. Unfortunately there isn't any English language > definition of it. But I hope an example is self explanatory enough > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2376126 Thanks for the link. This routes seem to have been mapped the same way as the first solution i've suggested. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit