[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > One thing that would help a lot is if massive batch imports (tiger, > mass gis etc) can each use a userid specific to the load. Then > identifying un edited data it is simple as any edit changes the userid.
Absolutely. > On a related topic... We are asuming that some portion of tiger data > may never be edited as it is correct.., any feelings on how much this > is, or how to detect it? One approach we sre consisering is to see it > a road has pois along it... If so it is probably ok, I'd love other > ideas. Well, I think that was the point of the "tiger:reviewed=yes" tag. Perhaps the procedure should be to delete the tiger:reviewed tag when you review a way? Absence == yes. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | Delegislation is a slippery Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | slope to prosperity. 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | Fewer laws, more freedom. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | (Not a GOP supporter). _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
