On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Theodore Book <tb...@libero.it> wrote: >> Despite my taking a "local" approach, I do think it would be great if we >> could do a coordinated national upload of the NHD data, however.
>I think it would definitely help make the US OpenStreetMap look more >professional to get as much of the NHD data in as possible. >> I am also looking at the GIS data from the Chattahoochee-Oconee National >> Forests, and was wondering if we had come to a consensus on National >> Forest boundaries - should they simply be tagged "landuse=forest", or is >> some other tag ("natural=wood", or "boundary=national_park") preferred? >> Or do people think that it is better not to tag National Forest >> boundaries at all? >I think they're worth including; most U.S. commercial maps show >national forest boundaries; landuse=forest seems to be the appropriate >tag to use. >Chris others have been using the tags leisure = nature_reserve boundary = national_park ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us End of Talk-us Digest, Vol 15, Issue 20 ***************************************
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us