On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Bill Ricker wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russ Nelson <r...@cloudmade.com> > wrote: > >> Okay, it's pretty clear that most people don't want this change >> implemented. > > but it's still the right thing to do.
Yes and no. Further to Apo's point that tiger:reviewed isn't well- defined enough to be useful, auto-removing it following any edit is equally poorly defined to be useful. I think we need to morph this over to a discussion of what, exactly, does the absence of tiger:reviewed=no mean? Does it mean one or all of: o I have travelled the entire length of the way. It is spatially correct. o I have examined every possible path for a vehicle through every intersection and they are all correct. o I have verified that all of the tags on this way are correct. -- Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
