On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > So how about boundary=lot
Fine with me. It's an issue I care about very little, it's one line of code to change. > I believe that in Mass > lot lines can straddle town boundaries - but I'm not 100% sure. However, now we're getting back on topic. Is that disallowed? Remember, these tags are placed on the borders, not the regions (which would typically be boundary relations), and remember that only the highest border is tagged. So if a single lot straddles two towns, that would be mapped with exactly the same borders as if there were two lots. The only difference would be in the boundary/multipolygon relation(s), which is not where admin_level is tagged. > They are definitely not political boundaries though. I guess, though it's hard for me to come up with an objective definition of "political boundaries" which includes all the current uses and yet excludes this one. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us