On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > Owlman wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch <dale.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming >>> > restriction, >>> > not a navigation one. >>> >>> Navigation is not the only purpose of OSM data :). >> >> I think it may have a use for navigation; an algorithm to find the >> fastest route could prefer paths through intersections that allow >> right-turn-on-red over ones that restrict it. > > But this still doesn't address the problem of the defaults, which *do* > vary by region to region (such as only one other state allowing left > turn on red from a two way street, contra to the national default). If > you have suggestions, please pitch in; since this also solves the > existing problem of all intersections with a stop sign or traffic signal > being restriction=no_u_turn by default.
Use a tag on a boundary relation to define the defaults? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
