As an example, we have WxyzNabc addressing in the western suburbs of
Milwaukee:

http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=43.208108,-88.161442&spn=0.003003,0.003428&z=18&iwloc=lyrftr:m,15548394324319276506,43.208382,-88.162156

The W203N10466 value is the actual numerical address (and appears on post
boxes like it was the "100" part of "100 Main St.").

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:05 PM, SteveC <st...@asklater.com> wrote:

> any idea where...? maybe we could get some locals to investigate what they
> are?
>
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> > So, it seems that the TIGER data have some interesting addresses like:
> >
> > Non integer address: 9-35
> > Non integer address: 9-01
> > Non integer address: K200
> > Non integer address: K210
> >
> > Anybody have any thoughts on how we should handle these?  The conversion
> > script complains about them but I'm not even sure if it puts them in
> > anyway or just warns.
> >
> > -- Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-us mailing list
> > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> >
>
> Yours &c.
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to