Alan, Thanks for your reply.
Does anyone have an issue if I work on adding these for Colorado? The GNIS defines a "Pillar" (I misspoke when I said Pinnacle) as ======= Pillar Vertical, standing, often spire-shaped, natural rock formation (chimney, monument, pinnacle, pohaku, rock tower). ======= tagstat (http://tagstat.hypercube.telascience.org/tagdetails.php?tag=natural) shows that "natural:rock" is being used. Would that be appropriate in this case? Mike On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:13 PM, am12 <a...@bolis.com> wrote: > >> It seems that not all GNIS Feature_Classes were imported > > Correct. > > I worked on part of it. I don't remember the details, but there were > feature classes that overlapped with other data sources (like NHD) so did > not appear to be useful to import. There were also many that did not map > cleanly into OSM tags. I don't recall the pinnacles in particular, but > there certainly was *not* one big GNIS import. > > And as mentioned, it could have been deleted also. > > - Alan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us