On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > my experience is that TIGER is the worst. > Well, there's certainly worse, such as the "USGS 2001 County Boundary" > import, which has way too few nodes to get any sort of precision. I've > been replacing this with 2008/2009 TIGER data. > forgot this one, have replaced it entirely already in CA with official state data
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
