On 10/25/2010 04:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I totally agree.  My point is just that some people and some states
(Michigan, Kansas) feel that the prefix itself is an important part of the
reference number: “The M in the state highway numbers is an integral part of
the designation…Michigan highways are properly referred to using the M and
never as ‘Route 28’ or ‘Highway 28’”.

It's part of the name when you're talking about the route, just like
one would say "I-95" or "US 1". It's not part of the designation as
shown in shields, either on the ground or on maps.

Oh, really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M-28.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Highway_System


_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to