On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:02:37 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny <pet...@gatech.edu> wrote: >> As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag things >> is minimal between these concerns. Therefore, wouldn't it make the most >> sense to choose whichever is programmatically the easiest and most >> flexible to deal with? > > It depends on what the you want to use route relations for. It's quite > possible that different uses would demand different ways of > structuring the route relation(s).
I would sey they should be set up that is best for mappers to deal with. Software can be made to deal with any scheme as long as there is a consistent scheme. Matthias _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
