On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well I've been using it in JOSM for a good chunk of the day now, > editing I-70 in western Kansas and eastern Colorado along my drive to > wherecamp. It has been working pretty well. Every once in a while it > seems to slow down a bit but it is certainly usable. > > I am using the tilecache in the imagery plugin. I did try the WMS > service as well. I gave the WMS plugin the capabilities URL and it > constructed a URL that errored out because it didn't have a "style" > parameter. I'm not sure if that is a bug in the WMS plugin or not but > after I added "&style=default" to the URL it worked as well. At high > zoom I noticed that there was a tiny offset between the tilecache and > the WMS imagery. Probably just a few inches on the ground. Maybe it is > just a projection thing? The WMS plugin makes EPSG:4326 requests and the tilecache makes requests in the web mercator projection, so the offset is probably from projection, and the tilecache is probably more correct than WMS.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
