On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> Other than legacy issues that would need to be resolved, is there a >> compelling reason to describe the route on something other than the >> route? I see this as a problem with consistency, but not one that is >> insurmountable; notice how bicycle routes were once tagged on member >> ways but have since been moved to relations, and no other entities get >> described by tagging a completely different entity. > > Street names also get tagged on ways instead of streets.
Traffic signals get tagged on nodes instead of intersections (there's a difference if either road is dual carriageway). Bridges get tagged on ways instead of areas (again different for a dual carriageway). _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
