On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Just noticed this: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/82696560/history > > > > Done. I think. Be good to have a local check it. > > > There are still some problems such as > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/82567761/history . Perhaps it > would be best to revert the entire changeset less any valid changes? > I fixed a couple other overlapping ways (a couple roads and a railways) that the JOSM validator found. It appears that some of the route relations in that city are pretty discombobulated as well.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
