Frederik's message on the imports mailing list reminded me... I was going to ask if anyone knows about the import performed in these two changesets in California: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9090477 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9091078
The result is clearly visible on the map here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.282&lon=-121.381&zoom=10&layers=M It looks like there may have been a similar one to the southeast of there as well. Here is an example of an imported object: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1722536 The import itself looks like it was executed fairly well from a technical standpoint although I would take issue with the lack of information in the changeset comment and no source tag (although it looks like the relations have a source tag on them at least) But I don't remember seeing any talk about this import before it happened. Is this useful data to OSM? The example relation I linked to is a natural=wood area which is certainly a mappable thing although it does seem to abruptly stop at the county border which I doubt is the real boundary of the forest... thoughts? Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
