For range data there is uncertainty how to increment addresses when an end is such as
N82W15855 VALLEY VIEW DR,, MENOMONEE FALLS, WI, 53051-3709, USA 45-558 KAMEHAMEHA HWY STE B3,, KANEOHE, HI, 96744-1944, USA 46-026 A ALALOA ST,, KANEOHE, 96744-3824, USA, HI On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: > On 10/4/2011 9:04 PM, Steven Johnson wrote: >> >> The purpose of this project is to improve the tagging and better reflect >> local addressing practice, particularly in areas where the Karlsruhe >> schema does not fit local practice. This includes Japan and United >> States, but likely other regions as well. We've made attempts to >> consolidate a number of addressing discussions and proposals from around >> the OSM wiki. > > I must confess that I haven't seen cases in the US that aren't already > covered by Karlsruhe. The only thing I can think of would be multi floors > and building interiors - which aren't generally mapped in OSM anyway. If the > problem is that something isn't documented clearly, that can be addressed. > One thing I noticed is that the page links to the proposed Karlsruhe schema > rather than the 'approved' page: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr > > I started to look at the US ... Address Data Standard and admit that I'd be > blown away at trying to at trying to add any of it to typical OSM address > data collection process. I'd probably just end up entering everything with > FIXME's and let someone else fix it. <g> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- Carl Anderson, GISP cander...@spatialfocus.com carl.ander...@vadose.org _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
