* Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> [2012-04-02 14:34 -0400]: > A total of *two* relations have network=US:US:Business, vs. 707 with > network=US:US and modifier=Business. Yes, I know I had major > influence in that, but that was months ago.
There's also one US:OR:Business (which also has modifier=Business), one US:CA:BUSINESS, and one US:I:BUSINESS:SPUR (which surprised me; I wasn't expecting to see that in the database). Even though the last time this was discussed in detail a couple people said they preferred using US:US:BUS, there are no instances of that in the current database. It's possible they used to exist but have been since changed, but I can't tell that one way or the other. That notwithstanding, I've gone back and looked through all the past discussions about route relation networks that I can find and it seems that almost everyone who expresses a preference prefers to view routes with modifiers as subsets of the main network and put the modifier in the network tag. With my "data consumer" hat on, I'm inclined to agree: although there are drawbacks to both approaches, I feel there are fewer inherent in the network-with-modifiers way. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Volt egy brilló's, a csuszbugó Gimbelt és gált távlengibe, Minden mimicre purrogó, Mómája ingibe. -- Lewis Carroll, "Jabberwocky" ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
