On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > The issues of the network=* tag notwithstanding, what should the route > relations be named? > > For example, for, say, Texas State Highway 20 near El Paso, should the name > tag say: > > "Texas State Highway 20" > "TX 20" > None (defaults to ref=20) > Something else? > > Hopefully we can at least get consensus on this...
I prefer the shorter version. While the longer version is more "correct" in some sense, the having a short name on a relation makes finding it in the JOSM relation list much easier, as well as distinguish from other relations that might have a ref=20 -- Jeff Ollie _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
