On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > >> What percentage of roads, where the old script would have punted, are >> now being expanded correctly? > > The new script is up now. > > I used Maryland as a test case > > In Maryland the number went from 21 roads it couldn't expand to 1. > > But that's 20 out of the ~70k it *was* able to expand, so either you > could say it handles 99.5% of all previously unexpandable roads, or it > handled .0003% of all total roads.
By "roads" you mean unique names? In any case, if it's only 20 for Maryland, it's probably a low enough number for the country that they can all be manually reviewed. >> What error rate is acceptable? > > "As low as possible" So any error rate is acceptable? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
