So basically if we see nodes like that, get rid of them?

-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Wroclawski [mailto:emac...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Metcalf, Calvin
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] administrative boundaries and Nominatim

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) 
<calvin.metc...@state.ma.us> wrote:
> So I'm somewhat confused about how nominatim actually works. A good 
> example is the building I work in (10 park plaza Boston ma) the 
> version of nominitum on the website gets the correct location on the 
> first try (note mapquest has it as the 3rd result) but they have it as 
> being

Often what happens is that you have one of two problems, in this order:

1. Nodes

2. Incorrectly prominent areas

Nodes are a major problem. In the case of a node area, Nominatim will attempt 
to guess at how large/prominent the area is. If it's a city, for example, it 
will be very lose about how far out it thinks the city borders are. 
Neighborhoods, same thing, and so you get these odd classifications.

The solution to this is to replace nodes with polygons, period.

Often related  is the fact that these nodes are often labeled incorrectly, or 
the area nearby is. That's why much of Washington, DC is considered part of 
Fairfax, VA, because Fairfax is a node, and a city.

- Serge

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to