On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: > So, as a generalized example of a specific instance that I have in > mind, I added some tags to some ways which reflected data that anybody > could verify from multiple sources with a little bit of research. I > didn't put a source= tag because the source was from USGS topo data -- > unquestionably public domain, backed up positionally with USGS ortho > photos. Sometimes the data came from research, other times from site > visits. A reasonably safe, uncontroversial edit. > > DUM felt it necessary to change the key of the tag to a different key, > thus violating rule #1 by *changing* rather than *adding* a new tag > with e's new key and the value I put into the tag. To make matters > worse, this key is one that e invented and seems to be the sole user > of. > > DUM has made this change to hundreds of ways that I know of, and > probably thousands or more across the country, and without any > consultation with others as far as I can find.
That's a little bit too general. The key question is, which key was right? _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
