Hi Jason, This is likely far superior to interpolation. Looking forward to more discussion on how a high quality import might happen. You can likely learn a lot by keeping track of the Seattle discussion
Best, On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jason Remillard <remillard.ja...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure if anybody is actually working on importing the tiger > address ranges or not. Just in case somebody is ... The Massachusetts > mapping department (MassGIS) just this week released data for all of the > buildings in the state! > > > http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/datalayers/structures.html > > MassGIS also has very good parcel data with addresses. I think we have at > this point everything we need to do an address import into each building, > rather than using address interpolation. For MA, using the state data > instead of the tiger data would probably be better. > > Jason. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > -- John Novak 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
