You. You have the ground truth. He has no right deleting useful data from OSM.
I think it's a general rule that when NE2 fights with other OSM contributors, he loses. On Feb 8, 2013 2:59 PM, "Paul Johnson" <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > NE2 is going on the "World according to NE2" bender again, need a ruling > on this relation before I revert: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2249811 > > Turn in question is southbound World Drive at Buena Vista Drive in > Orlando, http://binged.it/128OlwZ. Despite left turn only markings on > the southbound approach and a flush median gore preventing a straight-on > movement, NE2 is of the opinion, and removed the relation, on the excuse > that "Anyway, I've deleted the turn restriction, since I cannot recall > having seen any signs prohibiting the movement, and you have not seen any > such signs because you have not been there." Never mind that the left > turn only sign is clearly marked on the pavement. He questioned the legal > standing of the marking since it omits "ONLY," despite the fact that > section 4.2.1 of the Florida Traffic Engineering Manual requires ONLY to be > omitted in situations such as the ramp in question (a straight/left arrow > would be required for a through-or-left-turn lane). > > Who's right? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
