I'm not arguing that life is easy with parcels. I'm questioning the majority statement.
If anything parcels will be hard. That's a good thing. If we want to take the easy route we should give up now. Steve PS check out my kickstarter projecthttp://www.kickstarter.com/projects/237731198/gps-art-poster On Feb 25, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Josh Doe <j...@joshdoe.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 PM, SteveCoast <st...@asklater.com> wrote: >> Majority of what exactly? I think it's tough to put much credence in a >> couple of people on this mailing list vs. anyone who added data this month >> as statistically valid. > > If you haven't done so already, please try editing an area that has had > parcel data added. It is a nightmare. I know tools can be improved, but still > parcels have very little relation to any other feature, even landuses, > fences, etc. often don't line up. The only way I'd like to see parcel data > added to OSM is if the concept of layers is added to the API. Then we'd have > a landuse layer, a parcel layer, a ??? layer, and an everything else layer. > > -Josh
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
