Am 05.06.2013 um 19:20 schrieb Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>:

> The usual OSM approach would be that if a route is signposted, then it can be 
> mapped - if not, then not.


Somehow the on-the-ground rule was extended to include what is verifiable on 
paper as well. See administrative borders for instance, they are only very 
punctually surveyable. I agree that proposed features are somewhat of an edge 
case. Personally I would only map them if they had some particular significance 
(e.g. they are in the local media for some reason, there is a broader interest).

Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to