On 6/15/2013 9:51 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:35 PM, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
For the former, I don't need a painted line on the ground, just what the
City GIS department publishes on the open Internet, after these
lines/polygons/neighborhood boundaries were reached by public process.
There is a growing number of OSM folks in the United States (myself
included) who believe that government provided boundry data should be
used for data products such as rendered maps and geocoders, but do not
belong in OSM's core dataset (which is built around the idea of
improvements based on local, verifiable observation).
The sort of signs in the link below are precisely the sort of thing we
put in OSM, or at least have historically.
https://www.cityoftulsa.org/community-programs/neighborhoods/neighborhood-sign-guide.aspx
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
