Kind of looking forward to that, too, since it would allow more accurately mapping situations like Oregon, where State Highways are the original numbers used on trailblazers and what ODOT refers to roads it's roadways as, as opposed to the State Routes that usually traverse multiple state highways. Granted, some of these coincide, largely with the state highways and state routes adopted in the last 2 decades, such as SR 120/SH 120. Others are a bit more murky. For example, SH 1/1C/1W/1E coincide with varying parts of Interstate 5, various ocean beaches open to driving that have not been assigned a state route but are part of the highway system, SR 99W, SR 99E, SR 99 and more...
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net>wrote: > On 6/17/13 10:19 PM, Jason Remillard wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If the way is part of relation that has a ref, and the way itself does >> not have a ref, then the relation ref should propagate to the way. If >> the way has a ref, then that is what should be used regardless if its >> in a relation or not. >> >> Would that break anybody? >> >> it's an ok temporary expedient. > > ref tags on ways are erratic in the US, and in the long term we should > move to full use of relations and removal of ref tags from ways. that will > take quite a while, but it should be the goal state. > > richard > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
