I prefer your proposal, I find it more aesthetically pleasing. From a
developer's perspective, it's one less separate tag to read and parse. No
big fundamental objections to doing it the other way, however. As long as
we arrive at one convention and stick with it.

Martijn


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:15 PM, James Mast <rickmastfa...@hotmail.com>wrote:

>  Later tonight, I'm planning on splitting up the relations for the
> following Interstates (I-26, I-73, I-74) in North Carolina to separate the
> segments of said Interstates into normal and the parts that are posted as
> "Future". (will also update the ref tags on the ways since they are
> still being used too)
>
> Now, the "Future" ones will only be for segments that have signage clearly
> stating they are "Future Interstates".  I'm not going to be doing anything
> like this for ones signed as "Future Interstate Corridors".  The signage
> has to be like the following to qualify (blame different NCDOT divisions
> for the different styles):
>
> I-26:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/rickmastfan67/Interstates/NC/I-26/Img_2043s.jpg
> I-73: http://goo.gl/maps/G0qOG
> I-74:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/rickmastfan67/Interstates/NC/I-74/P1030940s.jpg
> I-840: http://goo.gl/maps/K20Hs
> Now, I'm going to initially use the following to tag the "Future" segments
> inside of relations:
> network=US:I:Future
>
> However, somebody else suggested this:
> network=US:I
> modifier=Future
>
> Which do you guys think would be the better way to go?  I can always
> change the relation tags later once we all agree on a proper tagging scheme
> for these types of Interstates that aren't true Interstates just yet.
>
> -James (rickmastfan67)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>


-- 
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to