* Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> [2013-06-25 09:40 -0500]: > There seems to be some disagreement on how to handle the super-two (or > super-four s California has a few of) highways. [snip] > I'm under the understanding that the consensus for a motorway would be > fully multiple (at minimum 2) carriageway with limited access, whereas a > trunk would be any motorway that doesn't meet that criteria (intersections, > single carriageway, etc).
That matches my understanding. Maryland Route 90 seems to be what people would call a super-two and, although parts of it are divided, other parts have no physical separation. For most of its length, it has no at-grade intersections. When I was doing TIGER cleanup in that area, I decided that highway=trunk fit better than highway=motorway. (Although NE2, somewhat unsurprisingly, decided that he knew better and has retagged it highway=motorway with oneway=no on the undivided sections.) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
