On 10/14/13 1:52 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Martijn van Exel > <marti...@telenav.com <mailto:marti...@telenav.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections and we > have set about editing some of these intersections in a way we feel > represents the situation on the ground better than their original > state, and because of that, works better for us. We have received some > feedback on our edits so we wanted to take a step back and see what we > (as the OSM community) think is the preferred way to map these > intersections. > > So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one, where one > or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade intersection: > > > https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e > > One of my colleagues at Telenav has remapped this intersection as > follows: > > > https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/3491f1fe-6afa-4571-bc43-7cb31c9c2625/9dd47d1445fdcf03d3f0bbd93b8e0f92 > > > I've seen more examples of your "after" photo than the "before" in my > mapping. I create them by default when dual carriageways intersect. > > +1 you're doing the right thing. > i consider the "after" a better approach as well.
richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
