I delete all of those but gnis:feature_id and source when I'm editing if I'm confident that the OSM tags are right.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Remillard [mailto:remillard.ja...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 5:57 PM > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD tags > > Anybody care about NHD tags???? > > The geometry is very rough on the import. I guess it's OK to delete the > NHD tags while fixing up the geometry? > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jason Remillard > <remillard.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I came across my first NHD imported data set this weekend, in Western > MA. > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43638395 > > > > It has the following tags. > > > > NHD:ComID = 7711652 > > NHD:FCode = 39004 > > NHD:FDate = 1999/09/06 > > NHD:FTYPE = LakePond > > NHD:GNIS_ID = 00212194 > > NHD:GNIS_Name = Lake Winnemaug > > NHD:RESOLUTION = Medium > > NHD:ReachCode = 01100005003135 > > gnis:feature_id = 00212194 > > name = Lake Winnemaug > > natural = water > > source = NHD > > > > The NHD wiki is pretty confusing. Is there is any kind of consensus on > > how NHD data *should* look inside OSM? Should any of these NHD tags > > even be maintained inside OSM? > > > > Also, the GNIS id is prefixed with 2 extra zero's. Is that OK, or > > ideally would that be fixed too? > > > > Thanks > > Jason. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us