Missed that the first skim through as I was intent on seeing about restrictions on automated requests.

Odd that something like a postal code needs permission from the postal service to reproduce, republish, etc.

Hello Tod:

This (import) vetting process includes the important question (by we, OSM, via these pages, amongst ourselves...) of "Do these data make OSM more valuable?" (Or something close to that which might blur a bit amongst us, but that basic idea.)

There have been many reasons offered why an answer seems a relatively clear No. I'm not sure what listens on the other side of those data offering any syntax to stick to. I mean, do people query OSM usefully for ZIP/census/mash data? I think not; no such data-query-render chain exists to my knowledge. Now, I don't wish to quash good ideas. I do wish to see OSM continue to be better "polished" with high quality data. Partly based on its usefulness of what it does now, partly based on leaving it blue sky for a wonderful future. It can be difficult to walk between brittle and flexible, but we must do our best.

Besides, ZIP codes ("zone, improvement, plan" might be lower case but the acronym is not) are not required for USPS delivery. Ask them. Or you might sent non-domestic. Ask how. Many people do not live in or receive mail a Buck Act created federal zone. Though millions do. Are you considering OSM being helpful to those people receiving postal mail? That's a valid question, and you'd just be at the data entry point afterwards. I still don't know what any syntax or queries or renderings or address matching or what lives on the other side of those data.

I don't wish to be harsh with my tone or the reality of the answers that have emerged: they are what they are. Accordingly, I wish you good day, and remind all of us that OSM intends to be a friendly, listening place. And sometimes the answer is "not really, no."

SteveA
California

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to