On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> wrote:
> On 2014-07-19 23:29, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Likewise, I'm in favor of heirarchies similar to road relations for >> cyclists (ie, Portland area network=lcn becomes US:OR:Multnomah:Portland >> or US:OR:Metro or US:OR:Multnomah; Tulsa's LCNs would become >> US:OK:Tulsa:Riverparks or US:OK:INCOG or US:OK:Tulsa or >> US:OK:Tulsa:Tusla or US:OK:Tulsa:Broken Arrow...etc >> > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycle_network > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycle_network#values Nice! OK, so apparently I'm not the first person to think this. Also explains why a vast majority of cycleways, particularly in the areas that taginfo suggests have migrated, aren't rendering on the cyclemap layer. Wonder if we can get Andy Allen to update the style to make use of this scheme.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
