Seems to me that if a bot could easily to this then a router could do it without having a bot go through and tag things.
I'd change the rules posted just a little. If… 1) Tagged with "tiger:reviewed=no" 2) Tagged with "highway=residential" 3) Missing "name=*" Then consider same as highway=service for routing purposes. I haven't delved into the preprocessing and database creation that any specific router does, but that does not seem undoable. I guess the issue would be convincing non-US based routing project(s) to include that logic in their database creation scripts. > From: Nick Hocking <nick.hock...@gmail.com> > Reply: Nick Hocking <nick.hock...@gmail.com>> > Date: September 1, 2014 at 9:28:45 PM > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org <talk-us@openstreetmap.org>> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Dirt Roads (formerly: Abandoned railway) > > While people work out how to remove the multitude of tiger ways that don't > actually exist, downgrade others from the incorrect "residential" to > "unclassified" or "track" > depending on imagery or ground survey, and fix the geometry of all unedited > TIGER data, I beleive that it's absolutely essential (from safety and > useability perspectives) to immediately mark all these uncertain ways as > unroutable. > > Whether to make them driveways or use access=no , I've no idea. > > I think thrse ways can easily be identified by... > > 1) They are original TIGER data import > 2) They have not been edited since import > 3) They are "higway=residential" > 4) They are unnamed > > A bot could do this easily and then it really doesn't matter how long it > takes to find the best solution.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
