*Regards,* *Hans*
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > > 2014-11-14 21:44 GMT+01:00 tshrub <my-email-confirmat...@online.de>: > >> Am 14.11.2014 19:15, schrieb Jack Burke: >> >>> What about submerged ones? Do we bother with those? >>> >> if we stumble over them, why not >> >> and it sounds for my as if those >> towns are still structures of reality >> > > > yes, another example is this one in Tuscany, It, which is normally > submerged in a lake, but will come to light every 10 years or so when the > lake is dried out for maintenance of the dam: > http://rete.comuni-italiani.it/foto/2009/61975 > > That is awesome! Thanks for sharing Martin! Situations like this: > http://www.gruene-bundestag.de/typo3temp/pics/e6d0cd2a32.jpg > are very different, in that nothing of the original landscape (or > village) remains (this is open pit mining of lignite in Saxony, Germany, or > more precisely a place called "Heuersdorf" close to the mine "Vereinigtes > Schleenhain" pic taken 09-02-2009). Another image here: > http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/17845958 > > The latter example shouldn't probably be mapped in OSM, as there is > literally nothing left now, while the former is still there, it is simply > degraded by the water and not visible most of the time due to the lake. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
