On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> > wrote: >> >> A caravan site might have 200 private hookups. We don't want the hookups >> to be rendered at the same level as the central dump station. >> Backyard dump stations should render even less prominently, if they are >> even mapped at all. >> > > Let's not forget that tagging isn't the renderer. If a renderer can't dim > or hide access=private on such a POI when it's not desirable to display a > private sanidump, it's the renderer, not the tagging, that's broken. > Let's not forget that humans are mappers. The shared sanidump at the local caravan site might well get tagged access=private. Or maybe access=private will be used for the per site hookups. *The cases seem to be:* private backyard dump stations. per-site hookup, available only to registered residents (at a long term residential trailer park or dock). per-site hookup, available only to registered guests at a leisure destination shared dump station, available only to guests of the destination shared dump station, available for drive up/boat up use. shared dump station, free. *Tagged on:* Way/node As a tagged property of a mapped place (e.g. campground, store, fuel station), without a specific position. As a tagged property of a numbered slot (e.g. sites 1-22 offer per-site hookups). Each of those cases needs clear tags if we hope mappers to use them consistently. Your suggestions?
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
